Intermodulation and Intercept

Radio Architectures, Pt 3: Intermodulation and Intercept Points

Intermodulation and Intercept Points

The mixer generates intermediate freqeuency (IF) signals that result from the sum and difference of the LO and RF signals combined in the mixer:

These sum and difference signals at the IF port are of equal amplitude, but generally only the difference signal is desired for processing and demodulation so the sum frequency (also known as the image signal: see Fig. 8-11) must be removed, typically by means of IF bandpass or lowpass filtering.

A secondary IF signal, which can be called f*IF, is also produced at the IF port as a result of the sum frequency reflecting back into the mixer and combining with the second harmonic of the LO signal.

Mathematically, this secondary signal appears as:

This secondary IF signal is at the same frequency as the primary IF signal. Unfortunately, differences in phase between the two signals typically result in uneven mixer conversion-loss response. But flat IF response can be achieved by maintaining constant impedance between the IF port and following component load (IF filter and amplifier) so that the sum frequency signals are prevented from re-entering the mixer. In terms of discrete components, some manufacturers offer constant-impedance IF bandpass filters that serve to minimize the disruptive reflection of these secondary IF signals. Such filters attenuate the unwanted sum frequency signals by absorption. Essentially, the return loss of the filter determines the level of the sum frequency signal that is reflected back into the mixer.

If a mixer’s IF port is terminated with a conventional IF filter, such as a bandpass or lowpass type, the sum frequency signal will re-enter the mixer and generate intermodulation distortion. One of the main intermodulation products of concern is the two-tone, third-order product, which is separated from the IF by the same frequency spacing as the RF signal. These intermodulation frequencies are a result of the mixing of spurious and harmonic responses from the LO and the input RF signals:

But by careful impedance matching of the IF filter to the mixer’s IF port, the effects of the sum frequency products and their intermodulation distortion can be minimized.

EXAMPLE: Intermodulation and Intercept Points

To get a better understanding of intermodulation products, let’s consider the simple case of two frequencies, say f1 and f2. To define the products, we add the harmonic multiplying constants of the two frequencies. For example, the second order intermodulation products are (f1 +f2); the third order are (2f1 ‘f2); the fourth order are (2f1 +f2); the fifth order are (3f1 ‘f2); etc. If fand f2 are two frequencies of 100 kHz and 101 kHz (that is, 1 kHz apart) then we get the intermodulation products as shown in Table 8-1.

From the table it becomes apparent that only the odd order intermodulation products are close to the two fundamental frequencies of f1 and f2. Note that one third order product (2f1‘f2) is only 1 kHz lower in frequency than f1 and another (2f2 ‘f1) is only 1 kHz above f2. The fifth order product is also closer to the fundamentals than corresponding even order products.

These odd order intermodulation products are of interest in the first mixer state of a superheterodyne receiver. As we have seen earlier, the very function of a mixer stage—namely, forming an intermediate lower frequency from the sum/difference of the input signal and a local oscillatory—results in the production of nonlinearity. Not surprisingly, the mixer stage is a primary source of unwanted intermodulation products. Consider this example: A receiver is tuned to a signal on 1000 kHz but there are also two strong signals, f1on 1020 kHz and f2 on 1040 kHz. The closest signal is only 20 kHz away.

Our IF stage filter is sharp with a 2.5-kHz bandwidth, which is quite capable of rejecting the unwanted 1020-kHz signal. However, the RF stages before the mixer are not so selective and the two signals f1 and f2 are seen at the mixer input. As such, intermodulation components are readily produced, including a third order intermodulation component (2f1 ‘f2) at (2-1020’1040)=1000 kHz. This intermodulation product lies right on our input signal frequency! Such intermodulation components or out-of-band signals can easily cause interference within the working band of the receiver.

In terms of physical measurements, the two-tone, third-order intermodulation is the easiest to measure of the intermodulation interferences in an RF system. All that is needed is to have two carriers of equal power levels that are near the same frequency. The result of this measurement is used to determine the third-order intermodulation intercept point (IIP3), a theoretical level used to calculate third-order intermodulation levels at any total power level significantly lower than the intercept point.

Scroll to Top
Malcare WordPress Security